World News

Australian government lawyers say Novak Djokovic was not guaranteed entry Tennis News

[ad_1]

The government court’s submission ensured that the tennis star’s claim to Australia was granted with a medical exemption from the COVID vaccine requirements.

The Australian government has strongly condemned the assertion of tennis player Novak Djokovic, who was granted medical admission with a medical exemption from the requirements for coronavirus vaccines, and stated in court documents that a foreigner was not guaranteed access to the country.

“There is no guarantee that a non-citizen can enter Australia. Rather, there are criteria and conditions for entry, and reasons for refusing or revoking a visa,” the government said in a court case on Monday.

Djokovic, du the number one male in the worldHe hopes to win his 21st Grand Slam at the Australian Open, which starts in Melbourne on January 17th. But instead of training, the Serbian player has been confined to a hotel used for asylum seekers and his decision to cancel his visa has been challenged. He stopped at Melbourne Airport on Thursday morning.

The Serb, a staunch opponent of COVID-19 vaccination orders, said in a file submitted to the court on Saturday that he had been granted a positive vaccine for COVID-19 in December.

His lawyer said necessary permits For admission to Australia, including an assessment by the Department of Home Affairs, the response to his travel declaration form indicated that he met the requirements for arrival without quarantine. The government discussed this.

He said the department’s email did not guarantee “his call”medical exception‘would be accepted’, and their answers can be questioned and verified upon arrival.

The government also sued Djokovic for requesting a medical exemption, claiming that he had contracted COVID-19 in mid-December and was cured two weeks later.

“There is no evidence that the applicant had an ‘acute medical illness’ in December 2021. All he said was that he was positive for COVID-19. This is not the same,” he said in the dossier.

The French newspaper L’Equipe published a photo of the player who was named Champion of Champions of the newspaper on December 16 and said that he had tested positive for coronavirus on 16 December in the court proceedings. Shortly after that test in Serbian missions.

It was not clear whether Djokovic was aware of his positive test at the time of the events in the pictures.

Djokovic, 34, has won the Australian Open nine times and the drama of his resignation has caused a stir in sports circles, sparked tensions between Serbia and Australia and has become a hotbed for opponents of vaccine orders around the world.

He also holds 20 individual Grand Slam titles, a men’s record he shares with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal.

Djokovic’s lawyers will have a two-hour deadline on Monday from 10am (23:00 GMT on Sunday), and the government department will have two hours to present its defense from 3pm (4am GMT). The case is being tried by the Federal Circuit and the Family Court.

‘Disrespectful’

The government’s dossier insisted that the court had released Djokovic from his arrest and allowed him to play in the Australian Open, but under Australian law the government had every right to re-arrest him and remove him from the country as a non-citizen.

This sparked anger in Djokovic’s father, who led another small protest in front of the Serbian parliament building in Belgrade on Sunday, where hundreds of fans protested, saying that the skeptical idol of their vaccine had been unfairly treated.

“Politicians are now saying that even if the judge decides that he can act, they can re-arrest him according to their laws,” Srdjan Djokovic said.

“Are we animals? What are we? We are human beings. This is because we are a small part of the world, but we are proud of it. They don’t respect him. ‘

Djokovic’s brother, Djordje, told protesters he wanted to see them on the tennis court soon.

Australia says its health department informed Tennis Australia in November that the organization organizing the tournament had a COVID-19 infection not necessarily a reason to be exempted in the country, as elsewhere.

However, Djokovic’s case states that the Interior Ministry wrote to him this month to say that he met the requirements to enter the country.



[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button