“AR is where the real metaverse will take place”

[ad_1]
If I were to ask you to imagine a Greek city, what would you represent?
I’m thinking of buildings like the Parthenon. In my history book Like Greece.
All of these buildings were painted in crazy, psychedelic bright colors: yellow, green, and red. Today, we think these are whitewashed buildings. We have always decorated our environment, our architecture, with decorations. These reality channels can make the world more interesting in some ways by using bits instead of atoms. Instead of painting, it is digital painting. It can be very localized, or maybe it’s something mapped around the world.
So kids who are in high school would not need to decorate the gym. Wearing glasses could provide a topic that people would see, right?
Of course, absolutely.
It’s scary to imagine if an augmented layer of reality is hacked. People can confuse you vision.
I think it can happen with anything. But I’m more concerned with smart home devices, for example, than hacking my nests, rather than hacking someone who carries them outside.
It seems to me that it is still shaping what our senses give us in a way that denies our reality. This seems unhealthy in the same way as the metaverse you are complaining about. Imagine a child who loves Harry Potter …Niantic has licensed the Potter universe. Maybe a child’s entire neighborhood would become the world of Hogwarts, and they would never shut it down. Parents always tell their children, “You live in a dream world.” Well, that would be the technology literally that they live in a dream world.
I don’t know, as a kid, did you ever imagine that there was more to the world than what you actually saw?
That yes. But I had to work on my imagination.
When you go to Disneyland, people recreate those things …
But then you leave Disneyland.
Why spend billions on concrete when you can digitally create it? Okay, there’s a stretch. If you’re marking the upward channel of reality, from translucent to opaque, where you’re replacing everything in the world with something synthetic, then I agree with you. But I’m picking things up selectively, putting flowers in boxes across the street. This can make the world more interesting in small doses. I don’t think that’s a bad thing. If your child gets to want to go for a walk in the park instead of playing computer games, that’s the job I’ll take on. Because you will see the redwoods, and you will breathe fresh air, and he will exercise. And if he finds a Pokemon hiding behind a fern, okay, I’m fine.
But it’s more than Pokémon. You are introducing a sustainable technology that is used for all types of offline activities.
Yes, that’s what we mean by “the real metaverse ”—the common substrate of all these transformations. Many of them would be for entertainment: giant robots, Pac-Man, Pokemon. But it could be pure utilitarianism. It can be used for shopping or any practical application. What differs from VR metabersion is that you have this common structure that is real world with ours. Bits are attached to atoms. So you have these things that add information to your place or provide useful functionality. It could put a virtual button hanging in the air, telling you to buy a bus ticket or check in for your flight, or the arrows painted on the sidewalk that takes you to the subway, or tell you about the product you’re looking at. whether it is ethically originated. That’s the potential that matters. AR is the place where the real metaverse will take place.
WIRED more great stories
[ad_2]
Source link