[ad_1]
Tick Guardian, Washington Post, and 15 other media outlets are based on leaks of tens of thousands of phone numbers that Pegasus is targeting. Devices associated with the numbers on the list were not necessarily infected with spyware, as outlets were able to use the data to establish that journalists and entrepreneurs were targeted in many countries—and in some cases were successfully hacked.
The leaks point to what cybersecurity reporters and experts have been saying for years: Although the NSO Group says its spyware is aimed at criminals and terrorists, it can be said that its applications are much broader. (The company released a statement regarding the investigation, denying that his data had been leaked and that the resulting reports were true).
My colleague Patrick Howell O’Neill has been reporting claims against the NSO Group for a long time. In fact, “the assassination of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi has been linked to cases involving scientists and campaigners promoting political reform in Mexico. Guarding the separatist government of Catalan politicians.” He wrote in August 2020. In the past, the NSO has denied these allegations, but has also argued more broadly that it cannot be held responsible if governments misuse the technology they sell.
The main argument of the company we wrote at the time is that it is “common among weapon manufacturers”. Namely: “The company is the creator of the technology used by governments, but it doesn’t attack anyone, so it can’t take responsibility.”
[ad_2]
Source link
