Sports News

DRS controversy: The hawk’s eyes must answer

[ad_1]

Indians it exploded in the cauldron on Thursday’s unforgettable temple display. They were convinced that Dean Elgar R. was the leg before the Ashwin rotary.

When the ball continued to show the opposite, they were angry. Their behavior was poor and they did not match the men who represented their country at the highest level of the game. However, from their notes, they made it clear that they had received the microphone from the motorbike, making it clear that they had lost faith in the system.

That is more dangerous than anger in the face of an arbitration decision. In fact, Marais Erasmus was the referee of the match, and after Elgar won the criticism, he was also surprised.

FOLLOW LIVE – SA v IND, Test 3, Day 4

Can DRS be manipulated? Apparently it can be done.

An international arbitrator told this writer that even though it was calibrated, DRS was operated by a human, and it depended a lot on how it handled the software. But then he gave no evidence to support his claim. And without conclusive evidence, these statements are of little value.

Technology-savvy Hawk-Eye needs to make a clear statement about DRS.

This will help clean up the air and how to use the DRS. When players themselves show a lack of faith in a system, the system must respond.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button