Justice denied to victims of Mai Laiko massacre in Afghanistan Reviews

[ad_1]
“Surprise: US top soldier removes assassination of US soldiers”
That should be the title attached to any story written about the “discovery” of a recent “study” of an Afghan family, including seven children, killed by a U.S. “Hellfire” missile in late August.
Of course, not a single editor, as I see it, was committed to telling this simple and bleak truth. Instead, most pulled a palette of common euphemisms for U.S. soldiers from the killings of a humanitarian worker in Afghanistan, Zemari Ahmadi, his three children, Zamir, 20, Faisal, 16, and Farzad, 13, for their killings. cousin, Ahmad, 30, and Ahmadi’s three nieces, Arwin, seven, Benyamin, six, and Hayat, two and two-year-old girls, Malika and Somaya.
So the editors wrote many headlines like this to summarize the foreseeable “consequences” of a report written by the U.S. Air Force’s Sami Said: “The Watchdog finds no wrongdoing in the Afghan air strike.”
The Pentagon was unable to write a more detailed “investigation” into the brief execution of Lieutenant General Said Ahmadi and his family.
The Pentagon is certainly pleased. But it’s important and instructive to deconstruct, to tell, to deconstruct that headline that the Pentagon likes, to reveal how wrong and inappropriate it is.
First, Lieutenant General Said would not have paid nanosecond attention to the killings of Ahmadi and his relatives if the Pentagon had continued to deceive the world about what happened on August 29 in the courtyard of Ahmadi’s home.
Recall that some of the most powerful U.S. “chain of command” soldiers immediately cheated in the face of an ambush, quick, expert, and direct revenge on the perimeter of the chaotic airport in Kabul in the face of a terrorist bombing that killed dozens of U.S. soldiers and lame Afghanistan. run away.
The Pentagon ensured that two “high-profile” terrorists were killed before others were mutilated and killed and that carefully planned drone attacks prevented, in essence, the creation of civilian casualties.
Citing an unknown Defense Department official, U.S. media reported that the main target was “a well-known organization” that was allegedly “linked to potential future attacks at the airport” and found by the U.S. and “sufficient.” eyes and enough knowledge ”to kill him.
Every word was a lie.
However, the Pentagon continued to repeat its lies with the ease of a metronome in recent days, even as the Afghans insisted that a large, large, non-terrorist family had been mined and incinerated. Few believed them, unlike “well-located” Pentagon sources, because Afghans could not, it seems, be trusted.
It had only been a week since the New York Times published a story questioning the official and false version of events, with the U.S. military reluctantly admitting to killing a family, not terrorists.
It turns out, the direct revenge of America was on Mai Lai with a drone.
In submissions examining his “report” – which would never have been written except for the excavation of a pair of skeptical journalists – Lieutenant General Said is described as an “independent caretaker”.
That made me laugh – and maybe you did.
While I’m sure Lieutenant General Said is a good officer, I’m sure he didn’t become a lieutenant general by opposing his superiors or causing unwanted grief to the Pentagon — his employer.
A one-page summary of his “classified” report – full of nasty escapes and bureaucratic double talk – reflects that Lieutenant General Said’s loyalty to the U.S. military, which he has long served, is not true.
Oddly enough, Lieutenant General Said decided not to address – in a credible way – how and why U.S. soldiers and officials spent weeks lying about the conspiracy to assassinate U.S. military and intelligence agencies in August.
He left that deadly negligence and deception untouched.
And, to his surprise, Lieutenant General Said reached the same verdict that U.S. senior officials have been parishing for months, and only after revealing the litany of their lies: the division and death of 10 Afghans was a deliberate but tragic but “fatal” death. ”Made by soldiers who had a“ real belief ”that more U.S. soldiers would die soon.
“Execution errors combined with disproportionate bias and communication breakdowns led to unfortunate civilian deaths,” Lieutenant General Said wrote.
He added, and here I am paraphrasing to remove the weeds of Lieutenant General Said’s bureaucratic double speech: Hey, he was in the U.S. Army understandably and he thought another attack was imminent. Every patriotic soldier involved in this cascading chain of deadly mistakes deserves a break, right?
Ahmadi continued for hours while he took his daily shifts to pick up and give water and food to the poor and needy of Afghanistan. However, somehow, he never once noticed that the technical magician about analysts who fill U.S. intelligence infrastructure was doing well in Ahmadi, not for the better.
A few minutes before the U.S. military fired on Ahmadi and his children, surveillance videos allegedly showed a child near the spot where the missile struck.
Lieutenant General Said’s explanation of this terrible “error” is as absurd as it is absurd. “The physical evidence of a child was evident at the 2-minute point,” he said in a news release. “But at 100 percent it’s not obvious; you have to look for it. ‘
Well, sir, that wasn’t the job of a U.S. soldier or soldiers who were watching Ahmadi come and go that day: Watch carefully. To see up close. See and then warn or cancel so that civil strikes are not destroyed.
The desire to prove that anger was driven and believed was a necessary and compassionate measure of revenge, my “true belief” is that U.S. soldiers looked, saw, but didn’t care who was killed while the Afghans were being killed. to quickly avenge the murder of their brothers ’gunmen.
Lieutenant General Said and anyone inside or outside the Pentagon who dares to suggest that Ahmadi and his family were not killed by mistake will reject anyone with the same certainty who once predicted the killings as a just eye-to-eye response to the panic. .
Lieutenant General Said and his Confederate must answer the question: How do they explain that from 2015 to 2019 the U.S. government – according to conservative accounts – made so-called “condolence payments” of more than $ 2 million to 455 Afghan families?
If they really buy into the claim that Ahmadi and his family have been killed by “mistake” by now, please also explain how the U.S. military continued to make “mistakes” after the “mistake” caused the “mistake” after the Afghan death. women, children and men again and again and apparently after each “mistake” they weren’t sure to make any more “mistakes”?
On October 22, 2020, an air raid on a U.S. religious school reported the deaths of 12 children and injured 14 civilians. Were the deaths of these 12 children also a “mistake”?
Four days later, a U.S. airstrike on the Taliban killed three children and a Taliban commander. Were the deaths of these three children also a “mistake”?
Like other long-running cases where U.S. soldiers killed Afghan children, women and men, we hope to accept the discovery of Lieutenant General Said that no single U.S. soldier had violated the law, including the rules of war. The destruction of Ahmadi and his family.
We hope to accept, no doubt, the word of this ardent member of the U.S. military, who was lying day by day lying about who destroyed him, in fact, when Ahmadi came home with the precious pitchers. water in tow, to be greeted by a cheerful and excited child.
We hope to accept, no doubt, that the U.S. military told all the lies in good faith, even if it was wrong.
Finally, we hope to accept, no doubt, once again that U.S. soldiers are innocent of killing innocent people.
Zemari Ahmadi, Zamir, Faisal, Farzad, Ahmad, Arwin, Benyamin, Hayat, Malika and Somaya deserve justice. But you, me and their families know that they will never get it.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.
[ad_2]
Source link