[ad_1]
A symbolic vote is expected this week as lawmakers and Joe Biden want to review and update the legal basis for U.S. military action.
The U.S. House of Representatives will vote this week in Congress to repeal the 2002 war permit to allow former President George W Bush to allow the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq.
Motion to repeal Authorization to Use Military Force (AUMF) In Iraq, with the help of President Joe Biden for the first time, he is expected to be taken to the House on Thursday, CNN reported.
The Biden administration said on Monday that the U.S. “does not engage in military activities based solely on the 2002 AUMF internal legal basis” and that the suspension “would probably have minimal impact on current military operations.”
But the upcoming votes in the U.S. Congress are seen as the start of a broader debate on reviewing and restoring the U.S. legal base in Iraq and elsewhere where military forces in Iraq and elsewhere are called “perpetual wars.”
“The President is committed to working with Congress to ensure that obsolete military use permits are replaced with a specific and appropriate framework for the elderly so that Americans can continue to protect themselves against terrorist threats,” the White House said. statement on Monday in favor of repealing the House.
However, without an alternative permit to respond to the current situation in Iraq, the repeal of U.S. law has skepticism on the part of Senate lawmakers, who must also agree to enact a House resolution.
“The 2002 AUMF was largely about Saddam Hussein, it is also clearly used to deal with Iraq and terrorist threats,” said representative Michael McCaul.
“Unless our military hears that the 2002 AUMF no longer fulfills its purpose of protecting Americans, we should not repeal it before it can be replaced,” Republican McCaul said.
The topic has been highlighted lately Assassination of Iranian General Qassem Soleimani U.S. forces on Iraqi soil saw many members of Congress as unjustified and reckless in their actions. The Trump administration later cited permission for the 2002 war in Iraq as a legal justification for Soleimani’s success.
U.S. and NATO troops invaded Afghanistan on September 11, 2001 after the al-Qaeda bombings and then the former Bush administration pushed for congressional permission and managed to overthrow Saddam Hussein to invade Iraq and prevent Iraq from acquiring weapons of mass destruction.
Later, the Bush administration proved that the excuse for invading Iraq was based on false claims, and in 2011 former President Barack Obama approved the withdrawal of most U.S. forces from Iraq.
Some U.S. forces remain in Iraq after U.S.-led campaigns to overthrow the ISIL (ISIS) group (ISIS) and hold the Syrian civil war. U.S. forces have continued to clash with Iranian-backed militias in Iraq.
“There are terrorist groups backed in Iran today that are active in Iraq, threatening our diplomats, soldiers and citizens,” McCaul said.
Defense Department Attorneys before the Trump administration The AUMF in Iraq in 2002 appeared to oppose the abolition of independence because it would deprive it of authority for U.S. military action against militia groups.
However, there is widespread support among Democrats in Congress for revoking the 2002 Iraq war permit, as well as the earlier 2001 permit linked to Al-Qaeda and Afghanistan.
Biden has launched it He plans to withdraw U.S. and allied foreign troops From Afghanistan to September 11, 2021, on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the al-Qaeda bombings.
Over the years, the 2001 and 2002 AMUFs have been used by successive presidents to justify a number of military actions, among others. drone attacks in Yemen, which in some cases had little to do with the original conflicts that Congress sought to address.
“Ideas that are not repealed or ended don’t make sense,” said Rep. Jim McGovern, the Democratic leader.
“Either we don’t do it properly, or we don’t take care of those things carefully,” McGovern said Monday.
[ad_2]
Source link
