[ad_1]
Donald Rumsfeld was a criminal, disguised as a half-coherent banal bureaucrat, in a well-fitting suit and tie.
With the removal of all the sharpened embroidery, that’s the epitaph that immediately occurred to me when I heard about his death yesterday.
I will also suspect that they will be reminded of the number of people who remain among the damaged places that caused such damage, suffering and grief.
And, if truth is a guide, then Rumsfeld must remember who and what he was now who is not blinded by the litany of pleasant lies that will be told.
In this predictable sense, there will be the usual silent praises, the perpetrators of the usual obsessive suspects, who predict a star-studded and uncomplicated life, sometimes for the succession of gentle presidents and grateful nations.
To get a bitter taste of the almost sick revisionism that is certain after his death, here is what the Associated Press describes Rumsfeld as “a skilled and spectator bureaucrat of a modern U.S. military,” whose fame was “liberated by the long and costly Iraq war.” “.
According to the AP’s large-scale account, Rumsfeld looked pretty benevolent in life, but he was accomplished, his “skill” and “vision,” unfortunately, unraveled by a wrong war.
The AP shared this sweet vignette about the former U.S. Secretary of Defense with readers without Rumsfeld’s bad career: “Rummy, as he was often called, was able to achieve ambition, intelligence, vigor, attraction, and great personal warmth.”
My goodness.
There are undeniable moments when the “establishment” press reaffirms its credentials, when the moment with important titles to such powerful charitable and supposedly “nuanced” tributes demands hard and lasting honesty.
The decision cannot allow Rumsfeld’s reprehensible legacy to be whitewashed quickly, perpetuating the unrepentant heat, the apologetic architect of the hidden torture chambers, and the state-sanctioned kidnapping racket.
Rumsfeld personified them — with a divine and passionate spirit — as all known, corrosive, and inhuman aspects of the U.S.’s discredited exceptional doctrine have repeatedly become despair, destruction, and death on a scarred planet.
In Rumsfeld’s erroneous geopolitical calculation, the U.S. was a benevolent Globe policeman, and he, a happy warrior in sharp suits and ties, foresaw a world resembling the mythical ideal of America, especially in the Middle East and Afghanistan. of democracy and pluralism.
The ugly irony is, of course, one of the defining characteristics of evangelical believers like Rumsfeld – like the presidents who worked – the necessary ability and, indeed, the need to kill and kill an almost incomprehensible scale. to achieve their supposed philanthropic designs.
Rumsfeld was a poor officer, in deed and word, who allowed his assassins to occupy the monotonous bureaucratic and flat oval office, known as the commander-in-chief.
Through this measure, Rumsfeld was successful. He ordered others to carry out the assassination through the comfortable and convenient core of the Pentagon, as always, except for real measures of risk or responsibility.
So in the raw remnants of the 9/11 attacks, Rumsfeld and his conspiratorial doctrinal friends took the opportunity to deliver their deadly and brutal imperial plans.
First in September 2001 came the invasion of Afghanistan to overthrow the Taliban and destroy Al-Qaeda. History and geography had to root out the instinct to immerse oneself in Rumsfeld’s war. They didn’t.
The sad and indelible consequences of Rumsfeld’s great offensive and strategic stupidity are clear: numerous innocent Afghans and American soldiers distorted and killed, billions wasted and a patient and revived Taliban ready to reaffirm their evil dominance over a wounded people and American territory. invade.
Rumsfeld’s tragic adventure in Afghanistan was a precursor to the cataclysmic calculation made by the Bush regime in Iraq.
The chosen war was a big, fabricated lie – validated and revitalized by the very establishment press that Rumsfeld now politely praises – that Saddam Hussein intended not only weapons of mass destruction but also the temperature to ignite the hair of the “madman”. , To release in London and beyond.
Once again, Rumsfeld stressed that the war would be quick, cheap, and win-win, and warned the cocksure company: there was no WMD; an invasion would destabilize, not “liberate” Iraq and surrounding countries; and the cost of living and treasure would be incalculable.
Rumsfeld mocked the whirlwinds of naysayers and quispings. “I don’t scratch them,” he once said.
Yes Yes.
Iraq and Iraqis still suffer the trauma of Rumsfeld’s signature arrogance, cruelty and ignorance – in mind, body and spirit.
Rumsfeld exacerbated his narrow irresponsibility by spying on enlightened Americans who were against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq set up by George W Bush and Dick Cheney, and eager to act illegally in illegal infrastructure.
However, perhaps the most obscene and graphic evidence of Rumsfeld’s own criminality was the international network of dungeons organized to torture him inside and outside Iraq under his command – using the sick, perverted means and tools – anyone suspected of collaborating with America’s “enemies”.
Rumsfeld played bizarre anachronisms that could overthrow the rule of law and international codes of conduct while impersonating and handing over human-like luggage to human torture dungeons that had been abused and forgotten in torture dungeons.
Through it all, Rumsfeld let out a groan, a sign of his immediate arrogant arrogance and his disastrous mission to save America abroad. Rumsfeld’s chronic coherence and deadly futility provided unreasonable and meaningless answers to questions about the serious failures of that mission.
Rumsfeld surely knew that he would escape from being responsible for the pain and misery caused to so many affected people in so many affected places.
He was reportedly able to die at home, surrounded by family.
That’s what Donald Rumsfeld did not deserve the calm and gentle fate he deserved and denied to so many other affected people, in so many other affected places.
The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the attitude of Al Jazeera’s editorial.
[ad_2]
Source link
