[ad_1]
Twitter says it used human review and technology to decide to suspend more than 300 accounts and hashtags.
Twitter Ferdinand Marcos Jr. He suspended hundreds of accounts to promote the Philippine presidential election candidate, saying he violated the rules on spam and manipulation.
Veteran politician Marcos, 64, son he overthrew the late chief In the 1986 “people’s power” revolution, he emerged as the leading candidate before the May vote.
Twitter said it used human review and technology to decide to suspend more than 300 accounts and hashtags, and added that its investigations were ongoing.
“We remain vigilant in identifying and removing alleged information campaigns aimed at election interviews,” a Twitter spokesperson said.
Marcos ’chief of staff, Vic Rodriguez, applauded Twitter for his work, but stressed that not all accounts were in favor of Marcos.
“We commend Twitter for its close focus on platform manipulation, spam and other attempts to undermine public dialogue,” it said in a statement.
Marcos remains one of those families the richest and most influential forces In Philippine politics, he has served for the past three decades as a senator, lower house deputy, and provincial governor.
Great social media engagement
Marcos Jr., though better known as “Bongbong,” has done just that strong opponents in the political establishment, he has a strong following of Filipinos, who are the main users of social networks, at home and abroad.
This use has been believed by many to have been able to manipulate Philippine political discourse through social media.
Twitter said on Monday it would open a test feature that would allow users to mark misleading content in the Philippines, including Brazil and Spain.
The Rappler news site reported this week that Marcos ’supporters wanted to dominate Twitter through accounts created in a matter of months. Twitter reported the report and said most of the 300 accounts had been removed earlier as part of regular actions.
Twitter said that sharing political content or gathering people via hashtags was within its rules, unless the accounts were genuine, automated, or paid, but saw no “clear evidence.”
[ad_2]
Source link
