[ad_1]
At the end in June, before the White House tried to respond to a ransomware attack from Russia, Moscow presented the new international cyber treaty At the United Nations. Moscow has been squeezing the Internet for years on the Internet, and it is recently pushed for one independent internet. Although the Russian government’s Internet strategies and policies are often misunderstood in the West — based on the false belief that Putin’s hand moves everything in Russia — this view of state dominance has remained clear. But as the Biden administration faces the threat of Russian cybercrans ’ransomware threat, the new treaty underscores Putin’s willingness to cooperate with the regime.
The core of the 69-page document is hardly moving: Putin’s regime continues its struggle for a more closed state-controlled internet. Significantly new, however, is that it continues passage Of a new UN cyber agreement Made by Moscow (and Beijing and other authoritarian governments) in December 2019. Then the Russian government took advantage of both goraka calls “cyber sovereignty”And that of the Trump administration weakens supporters of an open world wide web for the widespread support of American cyber diplomats. Then came the creation of a UN commission to study the new cyber treaty. replace du Budapest Convention Moscow has long opposed him to cybercrime.
Russia’s treaty, the Convention Against the Use of Information and Communication Technologies, awkwardly referred to as criminal purposes, refers to cybercrime, but the word “cybercrime” means very different from Putin’s regime than Washington or Berlin. In the West, “information security” is used in conjunction with “cybersecurity,” generally referring to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of systems, networks, and data. For the Russian government, information security it is much broader, bringing together the security of the Putin regime, the state’s control over information flows, and the “stability” of Russian society in a single concept. When dozens of countries back down when Russia demands information security, it is a push for state censorship and greater control of the internet around the world.
The definition of crime is equally problematic. For a regime that deals with all forms of violence against or against people — including murder, kidnapping, police brutality, and imprisonment– “Internet crimes” are online actions that scare the Kremlin or threaten Putin’s rule. Russia already has many laws censor technology companies and punished individuals share what they call “false information”. The treaty expands the language against cybercrime as Moscow pushes for greater coverage of Internet repression. References to “terrorism” are included in the same container, given that states have long used terms such as “anti-terrorism” and “counter-extremism.” remove disagreement. The treaty contains a broad definition of terrorism, which includes illegal acts caused by political or ideological “hatred,” setting an excuse to confront the opposition.
The treaty also includes many other well-known rhetorical tools of the Russian regime: references to state sovereignty and non-intervention in the internal affairs of other countries, Putin said. constantly stress—Usually in bad faith — because it is important for Russian security; vague definitions of computer operations that affect “information security”; extension of surveillance to companies for archiving user data and capturing online traffic; and cynical lip service to human rights.
Russia’s legacy at the UN in December 2019 could give the new treaty stronger legs than it would otherwise have; states voted to create a new commission to weigh in on the cyber pact, and Moscow has now submitted that document. The open question is whether many of the sponsors of the previous agreement will help. It remains to be seen whether Biden can marshal to successfully fight diplomatic resources.
[ad_2]
Source link
