[ad_1]
Three whites have been charged with Ahmaud Arbery for the murder of a black man who was shot dead in Georgia last year.
A U.S. jury has begun debating whether three white men are guilty of murder in the case of Ahmaud Arbery, a black man who was shot dead while running mostly through a white neighborhood last year.
A 12-member jury in Brunswick, Georgia, began discussions Tuesday. After a 13-day trial in which more than two dozen witnesses testified.
Travis McMichaelThe 35-year-old, who was the only defendant to testify during the proceedings, said he fired his shotgun at Arbery. self-defense.
McMichael; his father, Gregory McMichael, 65, and his neighbor William “Roddie” Bryan, 52, have been convicted of murder, aggravated assault and false imprisonment, including Arbery’s February 23, 2020 murder in the coastal neighborhoods of Satilla Shores.
Arbery’s murder became part of a larger narrative about racial injustice in the U.S. after a graphic video of his death leaked online two months later. An avid jogger, he was driving through a suburb of Brunswick, a coastal community 480 km (300 miles) southeast of Atlanta, when the defendants chased him and shot him.
Jury debates begin in a few days after being acquitted by a separate Wisconsin state jury Kyle Rittenhouse among all charges related to a deadly shooting at racial justice protesters in Kenosha last year. Rittenhouse, who claimed self-defense, killed two protesters and wounded a third.
The two trials have highlighted divisions between Americans over weapons, racism and vigilance.
On Tuesday, Supreme Court Judge Timothy Walmsley ordered a jury of 11 men and women and blacks over the last two-hour rejection of Attorney General Linda Dunikoski’s final arguments for the defense attorneys over the law governing the Arbery case.
Dunikoski asked the jury to find the three defendants guilty of all charges and argued that he was a defense seeking guilt 25-year-old Arbery for his death.
“The standard thing: the victim is maligned, it’s the victim’s fault,” Dunikoski told the jury. “I know you’re not going to buy that. It’s offensive. ‘
Defendants’ attorneys argued hard over how the judge would explain the law of citizen arrest at the heart of the defense. On Tuesday they repeatedly opposed what the prosecution said was a misinterpretation of the law.
Prosecutor Linda Dunikoski on Tuesday gave a final two-hour rejection of the defense attorneys’ final arguments. [Stephen B Morton/Pool via AP]Walmsley told the jury that someone could arrest a citizen only if a crime occurred “in his presence or on his immediate notice.”
The judge said the unannounced arrest should be made “immediately after committing the crime or, in the case of crimes, on the run.” If the person does not commit the crime and makes an immediate arrest, or on the run, if the crime is a felony, “the power to commit it is extinguished,” the judge said.
The defense argued that the defendants had the right to jump into their trucks and arrest Arbery and have a neighborhood duty to arrest him under the law, believing he had reason to believe he may have been linked to previous property crimes. on the edge of the neighborhood.
The video of the shooting on Bryan’s cell phone overturned the law that sparked the outrage.
It never appeared that Arbery had stolen anything during his runs across Satilla Shores. They killed him with nothing but jogging clothes and slippers.
[ad_2]
Source link
