[ad_1]
Tehran, Iran – All the signatories to the nuclear deal signed by Iran and the world powers in 2015 have said they want to restore it because there is no viable alternative, but the definitions of Iran and the Western “good deal” to achieve this goal are highly contradictory.
The seventh round of lectures It ended in Vienna on Friday to better explain the divisive approach of the various parties to the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan (JCPOA).
While the Iranian delegation said it had the order and willingness to continue in the Austrian capital to resume talks, European missions called for a short break to return to the capitals for consultations.
Delegates are expected to return to the Palais Coburg in Vienna for the eighth round next week.
Iran on Thursday submitted two documents to the JCPOA Joint Committee, made up of negotiators from China, France, Germany, Russia and the United Kingdom. The Europeans then forwarded the documents to the US, which is indirectly involved in the unilateral settlement of the 2018 deal and re-imposed sanctions on Iran.
The documents set out Iran’s proposals to lift sanctions and reduce the country’s nuclear progress. The country has previously said it wants to remove all sanctions imposed from 2018 at the same time, while the US wants to remove only sanctions that are “inconsistent” with the JCPOA, while maintaining human rights or “terrorism” designations.
A third document has also been prepared for immediate delivery, specifying that Iran has waived its guarantees and sanctions for the US to rescind the agreement.
Opposite rhetoric
The Europeans were upset that the documents were a maximalist stance on Iran, and that the administration of former President Hassan Rouhani was back on many of the issues agreed upon in the texts written by the end of the sixth round of talks. June. The new administration of President Ebrahim Raisi he took office In Tehran in August.
A statement from leading European diplomats said some of the changes requested by Iran in the documents were incompatible with the 2015 treaty, and said “it is not clear how these new gaps can be closed in a realistic timeframe”.
U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken also said on Friday that Iran “does not seem serious enough to do whatever it takes” to reinstate the JCPO, and pledged not to allow Iran to prolong negotiations while its nuclear program progresses.
Responding to the European statement, Russia’s chief negotiator, Mikhail Ulyanov, said “disappointment is too early” because changes are still possible.
Disappointment seems to be premature. The rule is in multilateral diplomacy: nothing is agreed until everything is agreed. So changes are possible in principle. But they need to be calibrated to fit the task to make further progress. https://t.co/kdgpGq9NjJ
– Mikhail Ulyanov (@Amb_Ulyanov) December 3, 2021
Following the talks, Iran’s chief negotiator, Foreign Minister Ali Bagheri Kani, told reporters that Europeans were unhappy with Iran’s proposals.
“We were told that these proposals were not in line with our views and I said that it was natural; we will not offer proposals that are in line with your opinions, we will say things that are in line with our opinions and interests, ”he said.
“The most important thing is that these proposals are based on principles that are also accepted by other parties,” Bagheri said, adding that other parties do not question the legitimacy or importance of Iran’s proposals.
Earlier on Friday, Bagheri he told Al Jazeera Iran’s proposals “cannot be ruled out in any way because they are based on the provisions of the 2015 nuclear deal.”
Progress of the nuclear program
During the Vienna talks, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announced in a report that Iran had begun enriching uranium to 20% purity at Fordow’s underground facilities.
The country’s “breaking time” —that is how long it would take if it were able to develop a nuclear weapon — has dropped by about a month and is rapidly declining.
Iran, however, has always said it will never look for bombs and its nuclear program is completely peaceful. The IAEA has confirmed that Iran is not making the 90 percent enrichment needed to own a bomb.
In an interview on Friday, however, Rafael Grossi, the IAEA’s director general, warned that Iran should give its inspectors “no access” if it wants to avoid further problems.
Iran and global nuclear surveillance have been at odds in recent months over a number of issues. Grossirena Visit to Tehran They had not reached an agreement or joint statement a week before the Vienna talks, but both sides agreed to hold talks.
Grossi also met with top Iranian and U.S. negotiators in Vienna, stressing the agency’s “essential verification role.”
[ad_2]
Source link
