[ad_1]
Amazon is not the only one. This trend can also be seen with the rise of automatic enrollment reader systems for individuals neighborhoods, A partnership with Google ADT, and the company launched “smart” security cameras to record those that offer the ability to define “events,” recognize pleasant faces, and detect noise such as broken glass. Because tech giants want to satisfy every aspect of our lives, home security has become a $ 50 billion business in the United States alone.
Joining the expansion of surveillance over the years, Amazon’s Ring partnered with more than 400 police departments across the country, following a successful multi-year strategy to turn law enforcement into a part-time door-to-door sales agent and make the term “portal pirate” our lexicon. . Behemoth then cynically tried to deal with the obvious racial consequences of this, in a consumer-driven way. In 2020 he released the Ring dash cam a Traffic Stop The way it allows drivers to say “I’m throwing Alexa”, and at that point, Alexa will start recording the next traffic stop. Enabling surveillance by a company that has done so much weed, it goes beyond the ability to eradicate racist ideas about what’s in a neighborhood and acts as a gentrifying force now throwing a bone at people who may be guilty of “driving blacks”. This is the very same logic that propelled the body-cam thrust. In both cases, the results of protecting the lives of blacks did not match the defenders ’claims.
In Dark issues: With the care of the black, Simone Browne, a professor in the Department of African and African Diaspora Studies at the University of Texas at Austin, suggests that racism against blacks is fundamentally coded in all of our visual, supervisory, observational, and surveillance systems. He says that there is no system of surveillance, at least when human beings are involved, that does not add to the opposition of Black. According to Brown, “the historical formation of slavery is not outside the historical formation of slavery.”
Advances in technology will not change the basic truth that surveillance and prison technologies are at the service of those in control. Stories of police response times and accountability have continued unabated, although they have seen much more surveillance in both public and private spaces in the 50 years since Brown’s patent. This calls into question the main assumptions about what keeps the community safe, a point repeatedly made by community activists and abolitionist police. Brown’s invention is not evidence of any conscious complicity with repressive technologies; on the contrary, it shows that the repressive function of technologies lies in the overlapping of widespread notions of race.
Many of these tools have become agents of gentrification. Black people “download” police into public spaces from people who become de facto police. They were the first ads in the ring explicit about this, we are also waiting for prizes in the form of free products. Although the company has downplayed this rhetoric in recent years, a key aspect of Ring and Neighbors is that it still confirms that you are doing your part to “fight crime” by owning the device.
Narratives that a particular surveillance technology will improve the way a surveillance technology works for black communities and in communities have also remained relatively stable over time. Complaints about improved police response time, increased security and accountability, more security, or better community relationships are constantly marking the introduction of new surveillance technologies (starting with police corps cameras). Green light project in Detroit, Stingrays or surveillance aircraft in Baltimore, the neighborhood automated license plate readers, and Ring Doorbells. While this may be indicative of what communities are demanding of the police, there is an alternative reading: promises remain the same and unfulfilled because these technologies exist as a fundamental practice for law enforcement to increase black and brown body surveillance. operates in this country. In other words, these technologies reduce them to the brink of systemic problems. More and better ways of caring will not be the solution to these problems, nor will there ever be.
It’s worth noting that, like Amazon and other private providers, U.S. cities and states are making more assertive claims about more security, even though other countries have already tried the idea and inadvertently found it. The UK is famous for being the largest network of CCTV cameras in a democracy Between 4 million and 5.9 million cameras were used in 2015, many of which are not government but companies and individuals. However, he is also the Commissioner for Custody in the UK and Wales worried the purpose of the cameras was to “build a surveillance society,” not to prevent crime, as there is little evidence that cameras prevent crime, and the crimes they cause property crimes tend to be more violent than violent. Audiovisual and audiovisual care of the environment is indisputable empirical evidence that does not create safer communities.
[ad_2]
Source link
