[ad_1]
In the kingdom international cybersecurity, “Dual-use” technologies they are capable of affirming and eroding human rights. Facial recognition it may be possible to identify a missing child or make anonymity impossible. Hacking can save lives by revealing key information in a terrorist attack or allow dictators to identify and imprison political dissidents.
The same goes for gadgets. Your smart speaker it makes it easier to order pizza and listen to music, but it also helps tech giants it gives you a more rigorous follow-up and target it with more ads. Your phone’s GPS both show you where you are and that data to the advertisers and sometimes as well federal government.
Tools can be purchased for one purpose and then, over time, used for another.
These subtle changes are so common that a conservative thinking in Nevada last month I was asked by teachers to wear body cameras to ensure that they did not teach critical theory of race, which I thought was ridiculous, offensive and completely viable. The body cameras were intended to be observed by police, but also used by police to misrepresent meetings with the public.
A few days later, “body cameras” tended to appear on Twitter after Fox News arrested Tucker Carlson he accepted the idea. Teaching bills against CRT, which have already been approved in states like this Iowa, Texas, and my original state, Arkansas, he continued to gain momentum. Now, I hope that these bills will include funding for the devices, as there really isn’t a pointless idea for the surveillance situation.
Logic (insofar as any logic has been applied) teachers force far-left activists to teach students how to deal with patriotism and instead hate America for the sin of centuries of chattel slavery. Body cameras would allow parents to monitor whether their children are being indoctrinated. (It’s there more support for than this you he might think.)
As told AtlanticAdam Harris the latest brand new the theory of critical race as an existential threat is about a year and a half old.
In late 2019, some schools across the country began adding parts The New York Times‘1619 Project to the curriculum of their history, angering many conservatives He rejected a basic thesis that reformulated the history of the United States around slavery. As a result of the assassination of George Floyd, his love of diversity and anti-racist training led him to denounce secret campaigns to revive some conservative writers. (Ironically, black men really are driving these workouts they are ambivalent about whether they will bring about lasting change.)
So it went from reading lists to becoming a “critical theory of race” to diversity seminars as an analysis of the legal system of Derrick Bell, a former Harvard Law historian who was far removed from the origins of the CRT.
This makes the turn to watch CRT illegalization so interesting: a poorly defined amorphous problem encounters a poorly defined amorphous solution, with the battlefield being ironically schools that have taken a lot of care in recent years.
The aftermath of the 2018 Stoneman Douglas High School shooting it led to a boom in “hardening” schools, often using surveillance: schools began to be equipped iris scanners, shot detection microphones, facial recognition for access and detection of weapons robots. Online, schools relied on the care of social networks (both on-campus and off-site) that upset employees each time student messages are entered words related to suicide or shooting. While he was scared of being a Republican lawmaker conversation about gun control, more funding for care and school officials became an alternative.
When the pandemic occurred, school closures became a reason for surveillance. Schools started buying trusted software facial recognition and even screen tracking. Then, as the schools reopened, the care companies he started another field. This time, the same anti-shooter software can detect if students are wearing masks or failing at a social distance. Dual uses are plentiful.
[ad_2]
Source link
