[ad_1]
Road administration Offering Covid boosts to fully integrated healthy Americans has caused an unusually wide and sharp reaction among researchers and policymakers. They believe it overturns ordinary decisions, relies on data that may seem more dramatic than perhaps, and undermines the U.S.’s commitment to other countries to provide vaccination so that everyone can be inoculated more quickly.
Director for Africa at the World Health Organization called him “The mockery of vaccine equity.” For U.S. ethicists and scientists, it seems that the moral leadership of public health, which was a national brand in the twentieth century, has been abandoned. They hope to see the decision adjusted, though it probably can’t be reversed.
“Americans led the fight against AIDS; we led the fight to eradicate smallpox, “says Lawrence Gostin, director of the O’Neill Institute at Georgetown University’s Faculty of National and Global Health Law.
Recovery: White House he announced on Wednesday Anyone over the age of 18 who has received two doses of Pfizer or Moderna mRNA vaccines can receive a third, a booster, eight months after the last shot. The shootings will primarily target health care workers, the elderly and nursing homes, and long-term caregivers, but are aimed at boosting the immunity of anyone who chooses to take them. The campaign is scheduled for 80,000 vaccination sites, according to the White House, on September 20.
The impetus for the decision was discussed in the White House by members of the White House Covid-19 Task Force. several pieces of research It was released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that morning. This study showed that in several groups — hospitalized patients, residents of nursing homes, and adults who were vaccinated at various New York State records — mRNA vaccines were able to prevent Covid-19 infection. (The research was conducted by CDC scientists and academic medical teams and was published in the agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, which is reviewed by researchers and editors but not formally reviewed).
Infection is the key here. Three studies found that the effectiveness of the infection vaccine fell from 95 percent to 84 percent in clinical trials among hospitalized patients, 79.8 percent among New Yorkers, and 53 percent in nursing homes. But the researchers noted that the original intent of the vaccine campaign, as contained in clinical trials that allowed formulas to be allowed, was to prevent serious illness, hospitalization, and death, and this new study does not determine whether these have decreased. New Yorkers on vaccine records, for example, found that between 91.9 and 95.3 percent of patients were protected from being hospitalized severely enough.
The case of the promoters, in other words, could be based on the prevention of diseases classified by the health authorities as “mild”, i.e., not being severe enough to be admitted to hospital. Federal representatives who presented the Booster decision announced that further protection for the vaccine could be abolished: “Although these new data confirm that vaccine protection continues against the worst outcomes of COVID, we are concerned that this declining pattern will reduce protection against serious illness, hospitalization and death in the coming months. can, ”Vivek Murthy said at the appearance of chief surgeon.
The decision was a slap in the face against the WHO, as its director-general has sided with rich countries to postpone reinforcements until the end of September, with poor countries first and foremost to protect the most vulnerable residents. Knowing that the decision came, Mike Ryan, executive director of the World Health Organization’s Health Emergency Program, described At the press conference a few hours earlier, he said, “We plan to distribute the extra life jacket to people who already have life jackets while we let other people drown.” Globally, more than 5,000 billion people remain unaccompanied.
[ad_2]
Source link
