[ad_1]
There is a bilateral agreement In Washington, the U.S. government should do more to support development Artificial intelligence technology. The Trump administration channeled research funding to AI programs; As Eric Lander Biden, science adviser to the AI, said last month about AI, “America’s economic prosperity is based on investments based on our technological leadership.”
At the same time, parts of the U.S. government are putting restrictions on algorithms to prevent discrimination, injustice, or waste. The White House, MPs from both parties, and the Department of Defense and National Institute of Standards and Technology all are working on bills or projects to limit the potential disadvantages of AI.
Biden’s Office of Science and Technology Policy is working on the risks discrimination caused by algorithms. National Defense Authorization Act it was passed in January presented new support for AI projects, including a new White House office to coordinate AI research, but the Pentagon required it to evaluate the ethical dimensions of the AI technology it acquires and to develop standards for NIST to control the technology.
In the past three weeks, the Office of Government Accounts, which oversees U.S. government spending and management and is known as the Guardian of Congress, has released two reports, warning that federal law enforcement agencies do not properly monitor the use and potential errors in criminal algorithms. research. One had a purpose facial recognition, at the other forensic algorithms to study face, fingerprints and DNA; both asked the legislature to look into possible problems with the technology. A third GAO report set out the guidelines Responsible use of AI in government projects.
Helen Toner, strategy director at the Georgetown Center for Security and Creative Technologies, said the uproar over AI activity provides an analysis of what happens when Washington wakes up with new technologies.
In the mid-2010s, lawmakers did not make much of a point as researchers and technology companies led to a rapid increase in AI capabilities and use. conquering champions in Go to start smart speakers in kitchens and bedrooms. Technology became a mascot for U.S. innovation and the talk of some technology-based lawmakers. Now the conversations have become more balanced and business-like, Toner says. “Because this technology is being used in the real world, you get the problems that politics and government need to address.”
Facial recognitionThe issue of the GAO’s first AI report this summer has received special attention from lawmakers and federal bureaucrats. They have nearly two dozen cities in the US the use of local government is prohibited According to the technology, concerns about accuracy are mentioned, as research has shown that it is worse for people with darker skin.
The GAO’s report on the technology was requested by six Democratic representatives and senators, including the House overseer and chairman of the justice committees. He found that 20 federal agencies employing law enforcement officials use the technology, some using it to identify people who may have been involved in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, or the 2020 protests that Minneapolis police killed George Floyd.
Fourteen agencies took face recognition technology out of the federal government, but 13 did not follow what system the staff used. The GAO advised agencies to make tighter tabs on face recognition systems to avoid the risk of invasion of discrimination or privacy.
The GAO report appears to have increased the chances of bilateral legislation limiting the use of face recognition by governments. At a hearing of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security on Tuesday to chew on the GAO report, a representative of Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas), chair of the subcommittee, said she believed it stressed the need for regulations. At this time federal legislation has no technology limits. Andy Biggs (R – Arizona), a member of the classification, agreed. “I have tremendous concerns, the technology is problematic and inconsistent,” he said. “We are finding some significant regulation and oversight of facial recognition technology. I think we can find a lot in common.”
[ad_2]
Source link
