[ad_1]
European Union proposed rules that would reduce or prohibit certain uses Artificial intelligence within its borders, including technology giants located in the US and China.
The rules to date are the most important international effort to regulate AI facial recognition, autonomous driving, and algorithms which promote online advertising, automated hiring, and credit scoring. The proposed rules can help around the world with promising but conflicting technology rules and regulations.
“There is a very important message around the world that certain applications of AI are not legitimate in a democracy based on the rule of law and a society based on fundamental rights,” he says. Daniel Leufer, European policy analyst Log in now, European non-profit digital rights. Leufer says the proposed rules are vague, but that it is an important step in verifying that the use of technology can be harmful.
You are likely to see the debate up close abroad. The rules apply to any company that sells products or services NI.
Other advocates say there are too many gaps in EU proposals to protect citizens from the many misuses of AI. “Having some bans is positive,” he says Ella Jakubowska, responsible for policy and campaigns European Digital Rights (EDR), based in Brussels. But he said certain provisions will allow companies and government authorities to pursue AI in a questionable manner.
The proposed regulations suggest, for example, banning “high-risk” applications of AI, including law enforcement for facial recognition of AI use – but only when technology is used to detect people in public spaces in real time. This provision also suggests possible exceptions when police are investigating a crime that could lead to a sentence of at least three years.
Jakubowska warns, however, that retrospective technology can be used in schools, businesses or shopping malls and at various police consultations. “There’s a lot that doesn’t go far enough about basic digital rights,” he says. “We wanted them to take a bolder stance.”
The recognition of a face that has become much more effective as a result of recent advances in AI is highly contentious. It is widely used throughout the year China and many U.S. law enforcement officials, such as through commercial tools Clearview AI; some U.S. cities have banned it police do not use technology to respond to public outcry.
The proposed EU rules would ban “AI-based social scoring for general purposes by public authorities” as well as AI systems targeting “specific vulnerable groups” in a way that would “materially distort behavior” to affect “psychological or physical”. damage. ”This may reduce the use of AI in credit scoring, hiring, or certain types of use surveillance advertising, for example, if an algorithm places ads for betting sites in front of people who are addicted to gambling.
EU regulations should provide safety assessments to regulators that demonstrate safety by companies using AI for high-risk applications. Failure to comply with the rules can result in a fine of up to 6% of worldwide sales.
The proposed rules require companies to notify users when they try to use AI to perceive emotion, or to classify people according to biometric characteristics such as sex, age, race, or sexual orientation or political orientation — even technically questionable applications.
Leufer, a digital rights analyst, said the rules could prevent some areas of investment by shaping the path the AI industry is taking in the EU and elsewhere. “There’s a narrative that there’s an AI race, and that’s nonsense,” Leufer says. “We don’t have to compete with China for forms of artificial intelligence that allow for massive surveillance.”
A draft version of the regulations, leaked in January, was leaked last week. The latest version has significant changes, such as the removal of a section that would ban high-risk AI systems that could cause people to “behave, create opinion, or make decisions that they would not otherwise take”.
[ad_2]
Source link
