World News

Mexican lower house polls show a setback for the ruling coalition Election news

[ad_1]

Presidential coalition Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador will be left with only a two-thirds majority needed for major reforms.

Mexicans have voted to reduce the power of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador An official forecast of election results has shown, giving his Morena party and allies a reduced majority that will make it more difficult to carry out significant reforms.

The National Electoral Institute (INE) estimates on Sunday that the governing coalition will win between 265 and 292 of the 500 seats in the chamber, in the absence of a two-thirds majority needed to pass constitutional amendments.

Lopez Obrador, who has promised to transform Mexico’s political and economic review, has made energy changes to protect the state’s energy companies.

In addition to voting in favor of the lower house of Congress, Mexicans elected 15 governors and state legislators in Sunday’s race as a referendum on Lopez Obrador’s policies and shaking up Mexican institutions.

Polls in recent days have shown that Morena has won most of the 15 governors ’races. The results are expected overnight.

The contest took place between the COVID-19 pandemic and the wave of political violence, which has killed more than 90 politicians since the election process began in September.

Two heads and other human remains were left at polling stations in the Mexican city of Tijuana on Sunday, authorities said.

An hour after the election began, a man threw his head to a polling station and suspended voting as police called him, a Baja California state prosecutor said.

A couple of hours later, at another polling station in the same area, a man left another head and smashed human remains inside a wooden box placed next to the ballot boxes.

More human remains were found in the bags next to the third election table, according to the Baja California Prosecutor’s Office.

Since taking office in 2018, after a huge victory, Lopez Obrador has sought to devote more resources to poor and critical infrastructure projects and has expanded the state’s role in the energy industry. It has also reduced government costs.

Critics say it has eroded institutional control and balance.



[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button