[ad_1]
Nearly seven years later, Remix now has about 70 teams, and has a list of clients that includes more than 350 transportation agencies on five continents, including titans like the MTA and Transport for London.
Every day, more than 240 million people interact with planning decisions made on the platform, from individual trajectories to system-wide reviews. March, New York, travel sharing company Get it through Remix For $ 100 million. (It will operate as a subsidiary of Remix Via, and the company says Chu and the rest of the staff will continue.)
CHONA KASINGER
Dan Getelman, head of technology at Remix, said one of the group’s goals is to allow transportation agencies more time to experiment. “It’s always disappointing to be a passing pilot, I think it once made sense, but it doesn’t match [riders’] he needs to be reactive to what is happening or he doesn’t feel it, ”he says.
However, the technology sector has an intricate relationship with public transport. On the one hand, technology has brought some urban infrastructure to the 21st century. Century, with advances such as software APIs (think subway countdown clocks), contactless payments, and navigation apps that make it easier for travelers to get around. But on the other hand, technology is a direct competitor; Companies like Uber have been criticized for deliberately removing pilots (and revenue) from public transportation while at the same time squeezing the streets. The best way for the two worlds to coexist is an ongoing debate in both worlds.
The remix may fall into another category. It is a technology company that aligns with the public sector, and is committed to attracting drivers to traditional public transportation options with a completely reliable service, rather than a completely new product. It’s a high-tech solution, for sure, but the surprising premise is low-tech: better built, and they will come. And in a fast-moving mobility world, Getelman says, the answer is essential: “Being able to do that gets a better system.”
Local actors
A kind of transit investment occurred when he hit covid-19. Yes, the city centers were emptied, but the promenade was outside the central corridors — along local routes and at neighborhood stations.it did not completely disappear, and in some cases actually increased. The cyclists were still moving; it changed where they were going.
Local trips like this are usually not taken into account by organizers who make transportation decisions. They involve fewer cyclists, and funding is linked to cycling. Races and classes also play a role; poor cyclists and people of color, it is likely to live farther away and they are less chance of owning a car, have long been left out of town planning.
[ad_2]
Source link
