Business News

Student athletes have won against the NCAA in the U.S. Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ruled in favor of student athletes who filed a monopoly challenge against the U.S. National Association of Collegiates. More than $ 14 billion US university sports industry.

Nine court judges unanimously ruled that the restrictions imposed by the NCAA, the U.S. governing body for sports collegiate sports, on education-related restrictions on student education were unfair.

“By allowing schools and universities to provide better benefits related to education, [the lower court’s] the decision can boost academic achievement and compensate student athletes in line with the value they place on their schools, ”Judge Neil Gorsuch wrote in the court’s opinion.

In a concurring opinion, Judge Brett Kavanaugh questioned NCAA practices more broadly, writing, “The NCAA’s business model would be completely illegal in almost any other industry in America.”

Resolution is the most important challenge in the American sports college business model, with traditions spanning more than a century, and in some cases some of the most important professional leagues in the U.S. professional league, such as football and basketball.

The NCAA and its member universities maintained that maintaining the amateur status of participating athletes is critical to the attractiveness of college sports, an argument the judges found debatable.

Weekly newsletter

Scoreboard This is a brief information about the sports business that the Financial Times should read weekly. There you will find the best analysis of financial issues affecting clubs, franchises, owners, investors and media groups around the world. Register here.

“Schools and universities across the country have used the sport to raise revenue, attract attention, boost enrollment and raise alumni money,” the court wrote in a summary of the case. “This profitable company focuses on students who are” amateur “athletes competing under horizontal boundaries that reduce the way schools compensate for play.”

Current NCAA rules limit the amount of compensation that athletes competing in member universities can receive for scholarships or related benefits.

The current case, an amalgam of several NCAA lawsuits filed by former and former college athletes, argued that those rules violate the U.S. Sherman Act.

“Our hope is that this victory in the fight for the rights of college athletes will be a wave of justice that will push for more aspects of athletes’ compensation, ”said attorney Steve Berman, who represented the athletes in the case. “This is the treatment that college athletes deserve.”


Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button