[ad_1]
They also say that many companies that trade internationally, especially NATO opponents, are “irresponsible proliferators” and deserve more attention from political leaders.
These companies include Israel’s Cellebrite, which develops phone hacking and forensic tools, and sells them worldwide including the US, Russia and China. The company has already experienced a major setback, for example, due to its mission Chinese repression Finding that Hong Kong and its technology were being used by a Bangladesh.death squad.”
“When these companies start selling their goods to NATO members and opponents,” the report says, “it should cause national security concerns among all customers.”
Trade is becoming more global, according to the report, as 75% of companies sell cybersecurity and intrusion products outside their home continent. Lead author Winnona DeSombre, a member of the Atlantic Council’s Cyber Statecraft Initiative, says they point to issues related to overseeing those sales.
“It doesn’t seem like most of these companies have the will to self-regulate,” he says.
By marking these companies as “irresponsible reproduction,” DeSombre hopes to encourage lawmakers around the world to get some companies more regulated.
“When these companies start selling their goods to NATO members and opponents, it should raise the national security concerns of all customers.”
Governments have recently taken steps towards some forms of control. The The EU adopted stricter rules about surveillance technology last year, with the goal of increasing industry transparency. And in the last month, the US has set it more rigorous new licensing rules for the sale of intrusion tools. The well-known Israeli spy company NSO Group was one of several companies added to the U.S. blacklist because it provided spyware to foreign governments by government officials, journalists, businessmen, activists, academics, and embassy staff who misbehaved. The NSO has consistently denied any wrongdoing he argued that it rigorously investigates abuses and shuts down customers who insult them.
However, one of the authors of the report says it is important to be aware of the true size of what is happening.
“The most fundamental conclusion of this show is that we are dealing with an industry,” says Johann Ole Willers, a fellow in the Center for Cybersecurity Studies at the Norwegian Institute for International Affairs (NUPI). “That’s a basic approach. It is not enough to focus on the NSO Group. ”
UN warning
It was recently raised by UN human rights experts alarms They called it “the increasing use of mercenaries in cyberspace” about it.
“It is undeniable that cyber activities have the potential to lead to violations in both armed conflict and peacetime, and therefore a number of rights are respected,” said Jelena Aparac, head of a United Nations working group on the issue. a statement. The group called on international legislators to regulate the industry more effectively, protecting the “right to life, economic social rights, freedom of expression, privacy and the right to self-determination.”
[ad_2]
Source link
