[ad_1]
October 1967
“How I stopped worrying and learned to live irrationally”: Whatever form it takes, resistance to any change is essentially an act of self-protection. When an individual perceives that the effects of a change are in line with his or her needs and desires, he or she will be concerned and fearful about his or her future. … Whether or not the circumstances justify such an answer does not matter. What is important is his negative attitude to cause his worries, fears or anger: change and / or its perpetrators. Such a process has little to do with intelligence, logic, and rational thinking. However, when committed to a path of resistance, he can easily justify his actions by finding the right rationalizations. On the other side of the fence, any resistance to change may appear to those responsible for the change, both mystifying and frustrating.
February 1971
From the “Implementation of social and technological change programs” section: The programs we have committed to, such as those based on poverty issues, crime, inadequate health care, or poor housing, have clearly not achieved significant change. … Maybe we just had the wrong ideas. Maybe we’ve never compromised properly. But a more fundamental critique will serve us better. The issue is simply that we cannot put in place comprehensive social change programs. We don’t understand the process, even if there are myths about it, and not understanding it undermines our efforts to tackle ideas like pollution control and the environment, guaranteed annual income, and administrative decentralization of social programs in a good currency.
July 1994
[ad_2]
Source link
