[ad_1]
And then this giant is, I’d say it’s a hidden emoji, after what happens to him. Finally, if someone uses the Facebook Portal or Facebook, let’s say, the glasses that can eventually be taken out, there are some functions that happen on the device, but in the end there is data sent to the server, how to give the consumer to control what happens after that?
FROM WHERE: Well, it’s actually pretty simple. There is no execution of that, but doing so goes straight forward. On Facebook, you have access to all the data that Facebook has with you and you can remove it individually or in groups. And we take that very seriously. That, of course, is a matter of politics, global politics at the moment. So from a data control point of view, it’s also easy from a sharing point of view, which has always been easy. Who do I share it with? Who is the audience? Both of these, in my opinion, are a fairly well-established type of control that people have over the Internet and devices.
In general, the question is, does the consumer want to exchange value? Look, this was translated by Microsoft in the early 2000s. As you install the software, it says, “Hey, can I share bug and analysis reports with the server to improve the software with the server?” Many people control this box because they are not worried. They feel, “Yes. I understand what it’s for, how it’s going to be used, what the data is about, and I’m happy with it.” And it hasn’t been a problem that you’ve been doing it for 20 years, doing some weird years. This is a common place.
If you want, go get a porch out of the box, if you don’t, you should, so you can move on and I’ll wait, I’m kidding. You pulled out a portal for part of the flow. He says, “Hey, when you use our assistant, when you use the word wake-up,” the thing is really explicit, “We need to go to the server where we keep the answers. And that’s how we understand the question. And not just that, an AI system or a company employee he can review it. “And it’s written on it and you say, ‘Yes, I agree.’ Or, “No, I don’t support that,” if we’d call it the scope of forced choice, that’s the user design language you use to describe it.
So everyone who goes through a portal and forms one makes that decision. So I think it’s very clear what it is, why it is, how it’s used, and they have a choice to use it or not. Listen, if I were to give an assistant without going to the server, I would like to, we don’t have the technology. We don’t have the ability to do this locally on our device. We cannot store knowledge from around the world on our device. So alas, you have to go to the server. By the way, we want to keep improving this thing so contractors can end up listening. So if you’re not happy with that, don’t use this feature. Same with Google fitness, if you think Google Fit is a useful thing in the cloud, don’t.
If you think the rest of the data is worth it, don’t do it. You don’t have to. For me, the point is to let consumers control the experience they want. I think sometimes we infantilize consumers like that, in a broad way, they are smart people, who have taken to the streets and made money, and instead of exchanging that money for a good or service, they want to use it to get value in their lives. . So I think from a higher point of view the mechanism is not hard, in fact running is the key piece.
[ad_2]
Source link
