[ad_1]
One oddity of the CDC’s recommendation is that it does not consider alternative vaccination approaches for adolescents beyond the adult dose and specific schedule beyond the calculations on which it is based. The CDC’s analysis “assumes that single doses of mRNA vaccines are 0 percent effective in preventing Covid-19-associated hospitalization.” he wrote Wes Pegden, mathematician at Carnegie Mellon University.
Although many media outlets reported a study published by the UK public health agency in mid-June found that two doses of the Pfizer vaccine protected 96 per cent of the Delta variant against hospitalization, many did not even mention a single dose. 94 percent sponsor. Considering the benefit of a single dose, and considering that most of the risk of myocarditis is accompanied by a second dose, critics have suggested different plans that would alleviate the risks for adolescents. Pegden, along with several authors, including an epidemiologist, two cardiologists, and a pediatrician, also wrote a separate essay essay Criticizing the CDC’s “all or nothing” approach, listing several alternatives. Monica Gandhi is a UCSF infectious disease doctor suggest many opportunities as well. Among them, adolescents or specifically young men take a single dose; administering a second dose later because splitting the dose may reduce the chance of a serious reaction; recommending vaccination to high-risk youth; and for any adolescent who has previously had immunity to the infection, with a single dose or no vaccine, at least for the foreseeable future, since the previous infection provides great immunity.
Despite a UK study published just two weeks later, Walensky said “UK data show that a shot doesn’t work really well, especially in the Delta variant, and you really need that background.” One of the two shots and it is still unclear whether one-dose protection is lost more quickly or whether there is insufficient protection later, but the CDC is paying special attention to individuals who get two doses, including those at significantly higher risk after the second dose, such as young men, seemingly useless and perhaps harmful myopic.
Until this point was reached, the slide at the committee meeting recommended that even if someone taking myocarditis following the first dose of the mRNA vaccine should recover from the heart, they should also consider taking a second dose. While they were some political professionals happy with this advice, plenty cardiologists and other doctor professionals condemned hura. Venk Murthy, a cardiologist at the University of Michigan, he commented: “Basically, it’s not in any case that a patient with myocarditis should take the first dose of mRNA vax and get the second dose shortly, even if the heart has recovered. The CDC did that wrong.” Doctors at three major university hospitals in New York and California, who were not allowed to speak in public, told me that this advice was “crazy”.
The medical establishment has stayed behind the CDC to protect its questionable messages. In a remarkable display of uniformity, the joint statementThe CDC was appointed by the heads of the CDC, appointed by doctors from the CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Heart Association, the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, the American Hospital Association, and 11 other national organizations. meeting. It reads in part:
Today, the CDC Advisory Committee met on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to review the latest data on reports among young people after the Covid-19 vaccine called myocarditis and pericarditis in mild cases of inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding tissue.
[ad_2]
Source link
