The U.S. has unveiled a strategy to deal with threats of “domestic terror” from the Donald Trump News

White nationalists face the greatest threat, the Department of Justice says, recommending the passage of the “domestic terror” law.

The U.S. government has released a national strategy to improve its analysis of domestic threats of “terror” more than five months after the crowd in favor of former President Donald Trump. he made a storm US Capitol on January 6 in an attempted uprising.

The plan, which was unveiled on Tuesday, includes increasing intelligence sharing among law enforcement agencies, avoiding “extreme threats” and preventing “extremist organizations” from hiring and mobilizing, in part, working with technology companies to remove online content that could be hired or mobilized.

Attorney General Merrick Garland, head of the Justice Department, said at the press conference that “national strategy recognizes that we cannot prevent all attacks. The only way to find lasting solutions is not to interrupt and deter, but to address the root causes of violence … we can promise everything in our power that we will do something to prevent these tragedies. “

Attorney General Merrick Garland: “The FBI believes the main threat of domestic violence comes from violent extremists of racial or ethnic motivation, specifically those who claimed white supremacy.” https://t.co/qRTtxgFs8d pic.twitter.com/Bsp8VseFoM

– ABC News Live (@ABCNewsLive) June 15, 2021

Numerous reports all intelligence and law enforcement agencies have found that in 2021, violent domestic groups posed a greater threat. The Department of Justice believes that far-right and white nationalist groups are the most dangerous of these threats.

Domestic “extreme threats” are a top priority for the Justice Department. The agency’s budget for next year Characteristics an additional $ 101 million for the analysis and monitoring of these threats.

The strategy also aims to investigate those with extreme views within the U.S. government and military in order to eliminate people who develop new perspectives as agencies. maintain extreme views.

The staggering number of riots that gathered at the U.S. Capitol on January 6 to stop a joint session of Congress to secure President Joe Biden’s election victory were both current and former. police and military members.

Law enforcement has long criticized the urgency of extreme right-wing threats, often paying special attention leftist and anti-racist groups and religious minorities.

The goal of the strategy is to “enforce the law without partisanship in the fight against domestic terrorism and ensure the public safety of all Americans.”

Biden He said in a statement: “Internal terrorism – caused by hatred, fanaticism and other extremes – is a stain on America’s soul … Our country opposes everything it does and poses a direct challenge to our national security, democracy, and unity.” .

Discussion of law

The plan comes amid a debate that Congress must overcome “domestic terrorism”To continue threats to increase law enforcement capabilities.

No current law exists, and some law enforcers complain that failure to do so creates problems in enforcement and intelligence gathering, including the lack of a generally accepted definition of “domestic panic”.

Smoke fills the outer passage of the Senate House with U.S. Capitol Police officers on riots on Jan. 6, 2021. [File: Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP Photo]

The Justice Department is also examining whether the Biden administration should recommend that the law be passed, according to The Associated Press news agency.

However, watchdogs and experts say he has enough tools at his disposal to enforce the law to effectively “police” domestic threats to the police.

A coalition of 151 rights groups called on Congress in January to oppose the passage of new “domestic terror” laws.

Coalition that brings together Human Rights Watch, The Brennan Center for Justice and Amnesty International USA a statement law enforcement agencies have “more than 50 statutes related to terrorism,” “to investigate and prosecute criminal behavior, including white supremacist violence, as well as hate crimes, organized crime, and dozens of other federal statutes. violent crimes“.

Failing to address these threats, “it is not a question of not having the right tools to employ, but of not using the ones at hand,” the document says.