[ad_1]
Big Tech companies spread nationalist arguments Suggest that American incorporations are a guarantee that their business models will not harm U.S. national security or U.S. foreign policy. Without a federal privacy law restricting data collection and sharing, however, this is an excessive exception. This data mediation ecosystem allows U.S. citizen data to fall into the hands of the foreign government, threatening national security and potentially sabotaging U.S. diplomatic and foreign policy activities. It also undermines American credibility in data matters; If the White House opposes individual Chinese technology companies while Congress does not pass a privacy law, such as Beijing trying to eliminate a potential means of spying on U.S. citizens, the U.S. appears to be more focused on companies than on general data mitigation. diffusion damage.
These Big Tech arguments, however, are linked to a second concern of a weak U.S. privacy law: distrust of foreign U.S. tech companies.
There are many legitimate reasons for U.S. tech giants to have reputable problems abroad market strength and wide lobby ra allowing hate to spread online and massive, exploiter data collection in a broader way. Phrases like “data colonialism” and “digital colonialism” have been used to characterize this phenomenon, especially when large technology companies enter countries with lower resources (e.g. Venezuela, Uganda, India), study citizens, and extract all value while headquartered. perpetuating other problems as unequal divisions of labor.
It doesn’t have to be that way. US officials are currently negotiating an agreement for the transatlantic transfer of data with members of the European Union, according to the EU court cancellation Privacy Shield Framework July 2020. Some may argue that the EU Court of Justice will rightly find any reason to rescind the EU-US data transfer agreement. But Washington can maintain its stance by placing real new limits on the collection, sharing and use of American company data. Even if the decision to repeal Schrems II, the Privacy Shield, is for national security access to U.S. data, this lack of a strong U.S. privacy law is almost always included in the same conversation about inadequacy.
Adoption of a strong federal privacy law in the U.S. could help American companies become increasingly complex and broken rules worldwide. For example, from India Invoice for the protection of personal data, Which was introduced in 2019 and is still being deliberated, was inspired by the EU GDPR (although it includes a wide range of dangerous exceptions for the state). Brazilian General Data Protection Act it also has similarities GDPRra. The more government laws are enacted, the greater the risk that U.S. companies will face regulatory challenges around the world and increasing public distrust.
For all the politicians talking about the importance of U.S. technology companies being competitive, this would not be to the detriment of democratic regulation that protects citizens from data-related abuses, nor should data abuse controls be seen as anti-competitive technology. sector. In contrast, as more data regimes are created around the world, Silicon Valley is expanding its study in foreign markets and with artificial intelligence reliance on a country’s privacy regime, enacting a strong federal privacy law could have many benefits for U.S. technology competitiveness.
Recently announced USA-USA Trade and Technology CouncilThrough this, US and EU member states will hold talks on everything from developing Internet policies to developing standards, with a strong implicit focus on China. Outside the G7, Biden he repeated The focus is on providing a “democratic alternative” to the influence of the Chinese government.
Biden’s intention to unite democracies with technology it has many challenges, in part, because it is not clear whether framing democratic authoritarianism is the best way to deal with digital repression. Depending on the execution of the plan, democracies may also see disagreements in the face of their technological challenges. They are EU member states, for example barely blocked Internet policy with Washington on a number of issues. In these conversations India is often assigned to the democratic bloc, but to that of the Modi government repression, attacks on democracy, and Internet abuse question.
[ad_2]
Source link
