[ad_1]
Roger Zelazny entered the science fiction scene in the 1960s with some groundbreaking stories that combined the sensibilities of the curd and the allusive pyrotechnic prose. One of his many admirers is the writer F. Brett Cox book about the author.
“It’s hard to overestimate the impact his work has on people who really love it,” Cox says in section 467. Guide to the Geek Galaxy podcast. “In my fiction, I’ve arguably spent my entire career trying to write something that could influence anyone ‘Pink for a church’ it affected me the first time I read it. ‘
In the 70s and 80s, Zelazny achieved tremendous success with his 10 volumes Anbar in the series, but critics believed that the story of the sword and witchcraft was a waste of his talents. Cox believes it is a critical consensus Anbar at best, it’s oversimplification.
“There’s often a gap between academics or critics between what we want to do in literature and what literature really does,” he says. “It simply came to our notice then Anbar the series is a very good example of what literature can really do. It gives readers a world to lose themselves in and be a part of. It just makes them hook up. “
And although Zelazny’s critical reputation has waned over the years, his fast-paced, playful storytelling style has had little effect on generations of fantasy writers. “At the end of the book I mentioned to some of the younger writers how Zelazny influenced their work,” says Cox, “and I know at least one of them, and maybe all of them, Anbar it was the door Anbar it’s the books that brought it. “
Zelazny remains unknown outside of science fiction, but Cox is hopeful that a film or TV adaptation could have a good name, as happened with Zelazny’s close friend George RR Martin.
“If it was a few years ago Speak that was done by Robert Kirkman The Walking Dead, he wanted to make a miniseries Amber Chronicles“So there are, perhaps, instructions that would lead to some kind of awareness.”
Listen to the full interview in section 467 with F. Brett Cox Guide to the Geek Galaxy (above). And see some notable points in the discussion below.
On the identity of F. Brett Cox Zelazny:
“[Zelazny] he was always associated with Samuel R. Delany, and they were also good friends with Harlan Ellison. It’s an interesting contrast because they were strong and very popular contemporaries. And of course, we all know how much Harlan Ellison has written about himself, and Delany has done extensive memory writing. But Zelazny just didn’t do it. … With people who knew Zelazny, I talked as much as I could, among the people I knew or had access to, and there was a tremendous universal consensus, both personally and well-received. No one had bad words to say about him, and that was very nice to learn. But also several people noticed that, as the saying goes, he was holding on to himself. There was always some distance there. ‘
About the critic F. Brett Cox Zelazny:
“As for the monographic studies on Zelazny, there was early Carl Yoke, a longtime academic in science fiction, was also a close friend of Zelazny’s — they grew up together in Ohio. And then there was Krulik’s book, and then there was Lindskold’s book. There is a quote from Lindskold in the presentation of one of the NESFA Press volumes collected stories, and his assertion is that Zelazny wrote some of these seemingly more common sword and witchcraft tales because he liked that thing. He grew up reading, he really loved that special branch of genre fiction, and he wrote it because he wanted to. ”
F. Brett Cox on the fame of literature:
“The subject of literary fame is endlessly intricate and fascinating. … Bradbury is certainly a science fiction writer who is still known to people, even if he doesn’t read science fiction, and Philip K. Dick has also joined that company. But even if you look [Zelazny’s] contemporaries, people like Delany, people like Ursula Le Guin, people like Joanna Russ, people like JG Ballard. [they all] he achieved great fame outside of science fiction — Michael Moorcock is well known in contemporary British literature — and Zelazny did just that. And I don’t have a specific answer for that. “
F. Brett Cox in Zelazny and Moorcock:
“When Moorcock was editing New worlds and they serialized Norman Spinrad’s novel Jack Barron’s mistake, Who were accused in Parliament of publishing obscene material. And Zelazny was also trapped. He posted for a while Creatures of light and darkness in New worlds, and some of his short fiction there. It was a very interesting moment in the correspondence I read in the libraries between Zelazny and Moorcock when Moorcock said, ‘Give me more. Write something down. ‘ It’s amazing how other writers of his time saw his work, and other writers in the 1960s were amazed at what he was doing. “
More great KABEKO stories
[ad_2]
Source link
