[ad_1]
Amit Malviya was verified through a misleading video of Delhi police violence.
On Wednesday, Twitter labeled the “manipulated media” in a video with the head of India’s party’s social media department Bharatiya Janata. he tweeted. Labeling tweets is not new; since March Twitter has been inaccurate tweets U.S. politicians, including President Donald Trump.
But for the first time the company was tagging a tweet from a famous Indian politician, eventually stating what critics might be willing to do. I’ve been wondering For years of social networking platforms in the United States – apply the same standards as they do with the US around the world.
The three-second clip was tweeted by Amit Malviya known for publishing disinformation as part of his party’s propaganda machine. A member of the Delhi police shows a stick against a farmer, one of thousands of people reinforcing tear gas, water cannons and police barricades. to protest new agricultural policies in India.
The clip police fail. According to the title of the video, “the police did not even touch the farmer.” Malviya’s tweet left a false impression that the police did not injure the man.
But other police members attacked the man immediately after the video clip was cut. Fact-checking websites he said in a longer version of the video a second policeman is beating the farmer, who later showed his wounds press.
Twitter also applied tag other instances of the same video that other people tweeted.
Malviya did not respond to a request for comment from BuzzFeed News, but a Twitter spokesperson said the company has complied with policies against media doctors.
“The referral tweet was labeled based on our Synthetic and Manipulated Media policy,” a Twitter spokesperson told BuzzFeed News. Clicking on a tag leads people to an author on Twitter summary debunks made by invoice verifiers and links to those debunks.
Politics, Twitter he announced in february defines “Synthetic and manipulated media” as images or videos that change or create “in the same way that certain events that change the original meaning / purpose or do not actually occur”. “The company first applied the tag was applied in March to a video shared by White House social media director Dan Scavino and republished by U.S. President Joe Biden in a video edited in defiance of the now-elected president and several tweets made by Trump since then.
But while a Twitter spokesman said the policy was being “applied around the world,” the company did not want to mention other cases of that label in non-Western market accounts. (In the past, Twitter deleted or hid tweets from the Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro and Brazilian politician Osmar Terra for violating the policy against coronavirus misinformation.)
Digital rights activists have long said that U.S. technology companies have not done enough to prevent the damage caused to their platforms outside the U.S. and Europe. Platforms like Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter and YouTube have been accused of not only polarizing political discourse but also feeding ethnic massacres South Sudan, lynchings In India, and genocide Myanmar.
“When it comes to labeling misinformation and manipulated content, companies are starting to take more action, but they still need to do better outside the United States,” said Dia Kayyali, associate director of human rights at Mnemonic. “We’ve seen huge amounts of resources flow into the U.S. and bring in more content than anyone could have imagined. Unfortunately, so far they haven’t offered as many resources outside the U.S..”
In India, experts say Twitter was forced to tag Malviya’s tweet after constant press calls from verifiers and social media. “It’s the result of years of ongoing criticism,” Pratik Sinha, Alt News, editor of India’s data verification website, told BuzzFeed News. But, he said, “this is the first step. It’s too early to be happy.”
Also, it’s too early to see what results the label can have. Tagging a tweet from a prominent member of the Indian government party can provoke a reaction in a country that Twitter believes is a key growth market.
BJP politicians accuse Twitter “bias”Against the Conservatives. Last year, Colin Cromwell, vice president of global public policy on Twitter, posted blog post titled, “Direct Record Setting on Twitter India and Impartiality”. Three days later, the parliamentary committee of India grilled the company’s Indian executives allegedly biased the company.
The label is also significant, as the video tweeted by Malviya is in response to a tweet from India’s National Congress, the country’s oldest political party and opposition leader Rahul Gandhi, who is a rival of the BJP. This means that they are wrong to say that Twitter is an event of a party.
Twitter denied him exactly why he decided to tag Malviya’s tweet. “To determine whether the media has been significantly altered and fraudulently altered or fabricated, we may use our own technology or receive reports through collaboration with third parties,” the Twitter spokesperson said.
“Members of the BJP,” Kayyali said, “can’t say what they mean just because they’re politicians.”
[ad_2]
Source link
