World News

US Supreme Court Athletics News has sided with former athletes in conflict with

The court ruled that the NCAA’s limit on payments to non-money college athletes is against competition under a federal law.

On the sidelines with student-athletes U.S. Supreme Court against Monday National Association of Collegiates (NCAA) The organization’s offer to maintain education-related compensation limits, critics say, helps maintain the fiction of college sports amateurism.

The court ruled 9-0 that the NCAA limits the limits on cash payments to education-related college athletes — including benefits such as computers, science equipment, and musical instruments — under a federal law called the Sherman Antitrust Act. The NCAA It is the main governing body for inter-university sports in the United States.

The U.S. San Francisco 9th Circuit Court of Appeals last year ruled NCAA rules against competitors, and upheld Claudia Wilken, a U.S. District Court judge in California, upholding an education-related indemnity.

Texas Longhorns pitcher Pete Hansen kicks in eighth inning against Mississippi State Bulldogs at TD Ameritrade Park [Steven Branscombe/USA TODAY Sports via Reuters]

Wilken set new rules that the NCAA was arbitrary and could pave the way for future challenges for other policies set by the organization.

Judge Neil Gorsuch, who wrote to the court, said it was not the role of judges to look at what reforms are needed in college sports, but Wilken’s order “could boost school achievement and provide student-centered compensation measures that bring value to their schools.”

Gorsuch admitted that “some will see it as a bad substitute for the whole relief.”

University athletes who filed lawsuits in 2014 and 2015 — jointly unified in the California federal court — argued that the NCAA’s compensation limits are a way to keep trade illegal, at a time when major inter-university conferences raise billions of dollars in revenue.

The case includes students who are top college sports players: NCAA I Division men’s and women’s basketball and the Football Bowl Subdivision. Football and basketball are the main sports that generate income at the university level.

Virginia Cavaliers catcher Logan Michaels (right) celebrates with outfielder Chris Newell in third home game against Tennessee volunteers [File: Steven Branscombe/USA TODAY Sports via Reuters]

Although the case does not involve direct payments to athletes, the wider problem of player compensation has become a conflict. University sports earn billions of dollars.

Under current NCAA rules, students cannot afford to pay, and the scholarship money that schools can offer is limited by the cost of going to school. The NCAA argued that its rules were necessary to preserve the hobby nature of college sports.

But former athletes who brought the case, including former West Virginia football player Shawne Alston, argued that the NCAA’s rules on education-related compensation were unfair and violated a federal antitrust law designed to promote competition.

Major university sports conferences joined the NCAA to defend the rules, including all the big money conferences called Power Five: Big Ten, Southeastern Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference, Big 12 Conference, and Pac-12 Conference.




Source link

Related Articles

Back to top button