[ad_1]
Researchers, industry directors, and how government officials have long confused how car driving cars may change the planet. If you could do something else while stuck in traffic, would it change the way you use your car? Would you be willing to live farther from work? Otherwise, the arrival of car-sharing cars would cause you to leave your personal vehicle shared Ubers, to make travel more efficient?
Car driving cars aren’t here yet, and it’s likely years, or decades, before most Americans have access to the technology they are still developing. But Scott Hardman believes he has found a way to look to the future. He is a researcher at the UC Davis Institute for Transportation Research, which examines how people respond to new fuels and new travel technologies. If you want to know how humans can travel a decade from now, it is useful to study the characteristics of partially automated cars, such as TeslaAutopilot.
Autopilot, together General Motors’ Super CruiseIt is an advanced feature to support Nissan’s ProPilot Assist, BMW’s Assistant Driver and Ford’s Copilot 360 drivers. These new systems will not drive you instead, but they will help. Depending on the system, they automatically stay inside and change lanes, hit brakes, or pull something away from the road. Two important notes: Most systems were built to operate on relatively uncomplicated highways. And he’s the person behind the wheel attention had to be paid, ready to take control.
In one paper published earlier this year, Hardman interviewed 35 people who owned Teslas with Autopilot, and most thought the feature was not so terrific. “Drivers’ perception is that it takes away a big part of the driving task, so they feel calmer, less tired, less stressed, ”says Hardman. “It reduces the cognitive burden of driving.”
In a new study released this month, Hardman and postdoctoral researcher Debapriya Chakraborty suggest that driving is so frightening that it has a natural consequence: driving more. With and without autopilot Using survey data from 630 Tesla owners of the pilot, the researchers found that drivers with partial automation drive an average of 4,888 more miles a year than owners without similar characteristics. The analysis has taken into account income and travel, along with the type of community in which car owners live.
Extrapolate this result to a wider population, and it could happen that partially automated vehicles travel to people, live, consume resources, and climate impact. For governments that need to anticipate future infrastructure demands, understanding these changes is key. Changing travel patterns can have an impact public transport budgets and road maintenance calendars. The more miles you drive, the more congestion the infrastructure gets. If electric vehicles are traveling, governments I still haven’t figured out how to charge. And while electric vehicles like Teslas rely on cleaner energy than these gas emissions, electricity still has to come from somewhere and that somewhere isn’t always a renewable source. Country formed increasingly widespread communities, a journey that honestly makes people travel hundreds of miles through autonomous or autonomous vehicles to get to work or play is not effective or sustainable.
New research suggests that partial automation may also have its ups and downs. Most of the thousands of miles that autopilots cover each year occurred on long weekend trips, Hardman and Chakraborty found. Before autopilot, these drivers decided to fly and that would create it more greenhouse gas emissions. In the end, it was a climate-friendly opportunity that they decided to maintain on the road.
A Nissan spokesman said the automaker did not have data on the travel behavior of its ProPilot Assist technology users. A spokesman for General Motors declined to comment on the study. Tesla did not respond to the request for comment.
[ad_2]
Source link
