Business News

Big Tech is lobbying moderate Democrats to defeat the new regulation

[ad_1]

Senior Democrats are backing away from attempts by their party members to regulate large tech companies, a sign that progressives are finding it difficult to rewrite U.S. competition laws.

Democratic members of the House of Representatives have attacked a package of measures being promoted by members of the anti-chamber committee, with some opposing some promising proposals that could lead to the break-up of Big Tech.

The risk shows how difficult it will be to shake up U.S. antitrust laws when President Joe Biden thinks about signing his executive order to strengthen the powers of regulators to promote competition in their sectors.

Zoe Lofgren, a Democratic representative from California, told the Financial Times: “I don’t think they spent a lot of time writing these bills. Some of those measures are embarrassing… I’m in favor of adaptations to antitrust laws, but some of them are radical.”

Another Democratic representative from California, Lou Correa, said, “I’m not sure we should try to disband some of these companies. And why do we differentiate between American companies, and especially California companies?”

The House Justice Committee last week approved six bills aimed at breaking the corporate power that Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple had.

The move is part of a broader push to achieve the most important change in U.S. competition law in a generation. But industry lobbyists are targeting centrist Democrats and those from California when they try to block the most radical measures.

One of the bills would be to ban large tech companies from prioritizing their products, and Amazon could stop practices like promoting products made in its online store. Another would prevent the purchase of rivals or competitor births, as Facebook did with WhatsApp and Instagram.

Biden has expressed support for Big Tech by appointing Lina Khan, a law professor who has called for the dissolution of Amazon, as chairman of the Federal Trade Commission and Tim Wu, another major critic, to be appointed White House adviser. Amazon on Wednesday he submitted the application With the FTC, Khan asked the company to resign itself.

Daily newsletter

#techFT provides you with news, comments and analysis on the companies, technologies and major issues that make up the fastest moving sectors in the hands of specialists from around the world. Click here #techFT to access your inbox.

Wu is one of those working on an executive order that would give industry regulators greater power to boost competition in the sectors. Under that order, officials are considering authorities banning “non-compete” clauses used by companies. including Amazon to move their workers to work for their enemies.

A White House spokesman said: “The president made it clear in his campaign that he is committed to increasing competition in the American economy… But for now there is no final decision on the action.”

Critics of Big Tech want to push for legislative changes after the FTC’s antitrust lawsuit against Facebook and the state’s top attorneys who use the current law are thrown out of court this week.

But comments from Lofgren and Correa show how difficult it will be to pass such legislation, even though it has attracted little support from Republican critics of Big Tech. The day came when Steny Hoyer, the Democratic leader in the House, warned that the bill had caused opposition from senior members of his party and they were not ready to vote in full chambers.

Earlier this month, an extraordinary set eight Democrats warned bills ”may undermine the protection of personal privacy [and] cybersecurity, and increasing the spread of dangerous conspiracy theories and misinformation ”.

Democrats have a poor majority in the House of Representatives and Kevin McCarthy, the leader of the Republican minority, has come out against it. An industry lobbyist was confident that the bills would not be passed through the House, and said, “Centrist Democrats and the California delegation should take care of that.”

Adam Kovacevich, director general of the House of Progress, the new democratic group that represents the technology industry, said: “We are focusing our efforts on those Democrats who are not on the judiciary committee and we ask, ‘Is this your component something? Clamoring for?'”

David Cicilline, chairman of the House Anti-Competition Committee, has told the FT that he does not expect the concerns of Democrats to prevent a full House vote.

“I absolutely hope that these bills will receive a vote and guarantee bilateral support,” he said. “Not everyone knows that this legislation is the result of 16 months of research to really examine these platforms, and that we have spent the first six months of this year conducting careful legislation.”

If bills pass the House, they can get support in the Senate from Republicans like Josh Hawley and Ted Cruz, both of whom have been major critics of Big Tech criticism.

But with 60 votes needed to pass a councilor, industry lobbyists believe only the least contentious measures, such as moves to increase funding for competition regulators, can be overcome.

[ad_2]

Source link

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button