[ad_1]
January 21 Facebook asked its oversight committee to review Donald Trump’s decision to ban it outright, and to guide whether the former president should be allowed to re-post. You could see it as the last coin. It has been three years since Facebook set up an elaborate structure for the supposedly independent organization to review its content decisions. And now that the 20-member management case has just begun to be known, Facebook has outsourced the most controversial decision the company has ever made. Would Donald Trump go back to social media, attacking those who were upset and emphasizing that he actually won the election? Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg tell to call his bright new board.
But the table did not play. On January 6, Facebook confirmed that it was correct to suspend Trump’s account for anti-riot messages, today he called the company for inventing a punishment that did not fit into his policies – an “indefinite” interruption. The commission told Facebook that it would take six months to rectify its rules directly, and then make the same decision to restore Trump.
Following the release of the verdict in a press conference, the head of the committee and Stanford law professor Michael McConnell made it clear that the committee had no interest in rescuing Facebook. “We’re not the police,” he said. “Our only goal is to sustain it Facebook accounts “.
The practical effect of the ruling means that Trump will not be on Facebook again for a while. A large part of the nation will breathe a sigh of relief, while others will continue to believe that the ban is part of a liberal plot. But the decision could be a decisive moment for Facebook’s alleged Supreme Court ruling.
The impetus for Facebook to form a committee was to get an outside voice to review the important decisions the company had to make about content. By 2018, no one trusted Facebook to make those calls. And for good reason. When it came to the most controversial situations, politics and business had a huge impact on the process of senior political positions. One of the most powerful voices in the virtual room in such decisions is Facebook’s vice president of global politics, Joel Kaplan, a former GOP activist and Brett Kavanaugh’s beast. In the end, the decisions are in Zuckerberg’s hands, as he is well aware as CEO of how Facebook’s speech decisions affect his reputation and business solutions.
Zuckerberg really agreed with the critics that no one should have the force of those decisions on a platform of 3 billion people. He created the commission and funded $ 130 million to appeal a group’s decisions on key content on Facebook and Instagram. famous figures instead of human rights, politics and the media. Board members quickly realized that their main challenge would be to prove that they are independent of the company that made up the organization. Initial decisions provided clues as to what the relationship might turn out to be. In one case In connection with the content thrown at Facebook, Facebook told management to stop deliberating because it reversed the original removal and the issue was debatable. The committee moved forward however, trying to deepen the issue.
Trump’s decision was still the clearest to indicate that the commission would not be flunky on Facebook. Perhaps Zuckerberg predicted that in deciding whether Trump should return, the management would release the litany of Trump’s valuable messages to justify his verdict. But the commission’s assertion that Facebook removed the January 6 posts was quick and bland. Trump’s representatives presented a document, saying it was “unthinkable” to see the former president’s office as a boost to violence, a claim denied by people injured and killed on Capitol Hill. However, the commission’s contempt was less directed towards Mar a Lago than Menlo Park. “It’s more of a decision than Facebook and its uses, rather than Trump,” former Danish Prime Minister Helle Thorning-Schmidt and Helle Thorning-Schmidt said in a press conference. “Facebook discarded its responsibility. They have to follow their own rules. ”
[ad_2]
Source link
