[ad_1]
On Monday, Li Yang, Chinese Consul General of Rio de Janeiro, He took it to Twitter the collapse of the building to mock subsequent rescue efforts in Surfside, Florida. “American-style rescue: very secular to save people, but too expert in explosions !!!” Li wrote, including photos of the part of the condominium that had partially collapsed and the demolition with explosives.
In other recent tweets, Li Called Adrian Zenz, A liar who has written a lot about the internment camps in Xinjiang. Li also mentioned Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau He was named “Boy” and “U.S. Dog Runner” Such explosions have helped Li garner nearly 27,000 followers on Twitter, even though the platform is blocked in China.
Li is one of them dozens of Chinese diplomats those who have found their home on Twitter in recent years, boldly going to the site on Trump to raise profiles at home and abroad. Encouraged by Chinese President Xi Jinping when he came to power in 2013, this cohort of voices — known as the “wolf warriors” after the nationalist film franchise of the same name — traveled around the world, frustrating enemies and receiving even the mildest criticism.
Xi has brought a renewed focus on ideology to China, as well as the return of Mao-era tools that encompass reconstruction frameworks and collective analysis sessions. When Chinese diplomats see domestic movements, “they fit in very well with the response in a way that protects their individual interests,” he says. Peter Martin, his new book, Chinese Civil Army: Wolf Warrior Diplomacy, Explains the history of Chinese diplomatic corps.
For today’s diplomats, caring for their interests often requires them to defend China’s interests and image in a stressful way, both online and offline. Last year, Chinese officials sparked a fist fight at a diplomatic event In Fiji, when they appeared uninvited to a celebration of Taiwan’s national day.
The nationalist and aggressive style is not very diplomatic, it also seems counterproductive, but it plays well for patriotic viewers from home and can be a path to promotion. Combined messages and theatrical explosions on Western social networks often return to Chinese social networks Maria Repnikova, professor at Georgia State University his research focuses on journalism and public messages from non-democratic regimes. Messaging is also reflected and disseminated in the state media Coordinated impact campaigns located in China.
When a diplomat was sent to Pakistan in 2015, Zhao Lijian filled his feed, both with tweet storms attacking the U.S. and with messages praising China-Pakistan economic cooperation. By 2019, shortly after Susan Rice was fired on Twitter with her former U.S. national security adviser, Zhao returned to Beijing and rose to become a foreign ministry spokeswoman. From that perch, he himself he tweeted March 12, 2020, which could have been brought about by the U.S. military Covid-19 To China.
In 2016, when a Canadian journalist asked Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi about a Canadian citizen accused and arrested in China, Wang replied, “Your question is full of arrogance and prejudice against China … This is totally unacceptable.” His remarks went viral, and a fan club of Wang’s online – already called by the Chinese press a “silver fox” – gathered more than 130,000 members. This is in stark contrast to the mid-2000s, when nationalist citizens sent calcium pills to the Foreign Ministry, suggesting that officials needed to grow their backs in the face of international criticism of China’s human rights history.
Although the support is new, the focus is not, although the volume can be increased or decreased depending on the needs of the day. As Martin writes, in November 1950, diplomatic general Wu Xiuquan gave a 105-minute passionate speech at the United Nations in which he labeled the U.S. “later malicious attackers in their relationship” with China during the Korean War. With China “and called for sanctions against the United States.
“Sometimes, Chinese diplomats are very charming, impressive, and use the discipline practiced in the Foreign Ministry to win international opinion and win China’s friends,” Martin says. At other times, however, such as the Cultural Revolution and more recently, “there has also been a very combative and aggressive side of Chinese diplomacy.”
[ad_2]
Source link
